BHBlasted Srl Societa Benefit, BHBroke Srl and BHN Ailed Srl claim Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd disabled their accounts in December 2024 without warning or explanation, and allegedly in breach of Meta’s own terms and conditions.
Counsel for the Italian companies moved an application yesterday for interim interlocutory relief ahead of a full hearing of the case. Meta is defending the action.
William Abrahamson SC, appearing with barrister Donnchadh Woulfe and instructed by Adams Law LLP, told Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger that Meta’s terms and conditions provide for the notification of account-holders of their suspension or termination in the event of a breach of policies or guidelines. The terms and conditions also provide that an opportunity be given to account-holders to remedy the breach, he submitted.
Mr Abrahamson added that there was no suggestion that exceptions to this purported obligation applied in the case of his clients.
Counsel submitted that Meta was in “wholesale noncompliance” with its terms and conditions when there was an unadvertised shutdown of his clients’ accounts on December 21, 2024.
Today’s News in 90 Seconds, Wednesday, October 29
Mr Abrahamson also submitted that the first time Meta identified why his clients’ accounts were closed was in affidavits sworn in the High Court proceedings. Meta claims the Italian companies regularly and repeatedly published advertisements that violated terms and conditions, Mr Abrahamson said.
Counsel submitted that the court should not consider exhibits of the purported offending advertisement because of a lack of information put before the court. He said it was not possible for his clients to say if the exhibited advertisements were published by his clients.
The court heard the Italian companies made prepayments to Meta for use of its services, namely the placing of advertisements on Meta platforms.
Mr Abrahamson said his client’s accounts were in credit by up to €6m at the time the accounts were disabled. Counsel said this money is still held by Meta, and his clients cannot access it. The court heard the credit figure was in dispute.
Kelley Smith, appearing with barrister Gerard Downey for Meta, and instructed by A&L Goodbody, rejected the assertion that her client was obliged to give notice of a decision to suspend the Italian companies’ accounts.
She submitted that the terms and conditions referred to by Mr Abrahamson provide that Meta has an entitlement to remove accounts without warning, if they consider the account-holders’ breach to be serious.
Ms Smith said that her client’s position was that the Italian companies had not identified a legal entitlement for the reinstatement of a suspended account.
Ms Smith submitted that her client had sworn evidence before the court that offending advertisements exhibited to the court are related to the plaintiff’s accounts.
Ms Smith said her client’s wish to stop doing business with the companies is with a view to “protecting end users” of Meta platforms, she said.
Ms Justice Bolger reserved her judgment.
source